Trial reportAmerican journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
Treatment of Clinically Diagnosed Alzheimer's Disease by External Counterpulsation A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo assess external counterpulsation (ECP) effects on cognitive and functional decline in early AD.MethodsThis 12-month, multicenter, blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial enrolled 190 patients with early AD (MCI due to AD or mild AD per NIA-AA clinical criteria). Participants received either full-pressure ECP (150-300 mmHg) or sham (25 mmHg): 3-5 weekly one-hour sessions for 35 treatments, then twice-weekly through six months. Assessments occurred at baseline and weeks 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 52. Primary endpoints included ADCS-ADL, ADAS-cog-14, and VADAS-cog.ResultsFull-pressure ECP significantly improved ADCS-ADL scores versus sham (mean change 2.57 vs. -0.49; p=0.036) and VADAS-cog scores (9.95 vs. 5.22; p=0.005) at 12-24 weeks. Benefits persisted through 52 weeks despite treatment cessation at 6 months. No serious device-related adverse events occurred.ConclusionsFull-pressure ECP therapy significantly improved cognition and ADL compared to sham treatment in early AD. ECP represents a novel therapeutic approach warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.