Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133741›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Encoding performance of cortical neurons critically depends on their morphological and neurophysiological properties.

Omer Revah, Fred Wolf, Michael J Gutnick, Andreas Neef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Omer RevahKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Fred WolfGöttingen Campus Institute for Dynamics of Biological Networks, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7068-3762
Michael J GutnickKoret School of Veterinary Medicine, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2564-5094
Andreas NeefGöttingen Campus Institute for Dynamics of Biological Networks, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-7478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sixty years after the concept of population coding in neuronal networks was introduced, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of its performance limits and the role of neuronal physiology. Here, we use dynamic gain analysis in a general model of population coding and demonstrate that disparate parameters of neurons and populations determine how accurately they can encode information. These are cell number, cell size, and the correlation time of the background noise. We experimentally test and confirm these predictions on neurons of excitatory populations in the mouse barrel cortex. Surprisingly, dendrite size and background correlations are precisely matched with the number of neurons in layer 4, such that even a single thalamocortical spike at the input is reliably reflected in the population output. However, this encoding performance can be modulated by the channels that mediate M-current, suggesting that coding in layer 4 may vary as a function of brain state.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexNeuronsSomatosensory CortexAction PotentialsAnimalsCell CountCell SizeDendritesMiceModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID42133741
PMCPMC13175474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.