ArticlePloS one2026
Phenotypic heterogeneity in a batch culture of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with different light tolerances.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic diversity of populations is essential for generating phenotypic variation to allow a flexible response to a shift in environmental conditions. Compared to genetically diverse populations, you would predict that cultures of genetically identical individuals grown in the lab would have low phenotypic heterogeneity. However, we isolated two subpopulations of genetically identical individuals from an exponentially growing batch culture of the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using Percoll step-gradients. The culture fractionated into a low-density, Top fraction and a high-density, Bottom fraction. These subpopulations displayed several phenotypic differences, including size, protein content, the amount of chlorophyll per cell, and photosynthetic performance. Because of the variation in pigment content and photosynthetic performance, we tested the hypothesis that there are differences in their tolerance to light stress. Following high-light stress, the Bottom subpopulation was more resistant to photodamage, had a greater capacity for light dissipation, and had a minimal photoacclimation response to high light, compared to the Top subpopulation. The Bottom population also had a greater resistance to exogenously induced singlet oxygen stress mediated by rose bengal. We hypothesize that these subpopulations are derived from stochastic mechanism where the Bottom subpopulation has activated a general high-light stress response pathway as part of a "bet-hedging" strategy that could give it a fitness advantage with a shift towards a light-stress environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.