ArticlePloS one2026
Development of AI-based dopamine transporter (DAT) image generation technique using early phase [18F]-FP-CIT PET imaging.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Equivocal Dopamine Transporter Imaging: Integrating Visual Assessment, Quantification, and Clinical Follow-Up.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and validate a deep learning-based model capable of generating dopamine transporter (DAT) images from early-phase [18F]-FP-CIT positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. MATERIALS AND
methodsConditional generative adversarial network was trained using 477 dual-phase [¹⁸F]-FP-CIT PET scans acquired with a conventional PET system. The model generated delayed-phase images from early-phase dynamic scans (30-40 min post-injection), using five adjacent axial slices to predict the central delayed-phase slice. The model was evaluated using an internal validation set from the same scanner and an independent prospective validation set from a digital PET system. Striatal binding ratios (SNBR) and inter-subregional ratios were compared using Pearson's correlation and receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (AUC) analyses.
resultsGenerated images showed high similarity to real delayed images. SNBRs for the whole striatum correlated strongly between real and generated images (R = 0.93 and 0.90 for internal and independent sets, respectively). Diagnostic performance was comparable with the highest AUC observed in the posterior putamen (real vs generated: 1.00 vs 0.98, p > 0.2). Visual assessments revealed no uninterpretable images, and interpretability did not differ significantly. Diagnostic accuracy of generated images was comparable to that of real images in the internal validation set for detection of abnormality (p = 0.453) and degenerative parkinsonism (DP) (p = 1.000). In the independent validation set, DP detection remained comparable (p = 0.25), whereas real images demonstrated significantly higher accuracy for abnormality detection (p < 0.001).
conclusionDeep learning-based model generated DAT images achieve satisfactory performance in quantitative and visual assessments across internal and independent validation sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.