ArticlePloS one2026
Spatial distribution of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in central Hokkaido, Japan and associated ecological factors revealed by intensive short-term survey in 2024.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tick-borne pathogens are transmitted by tick bites to cause infectious diseases in humans and domestic animals. To anticipate tick-borne disease occurrence, a high resolution understanding of infection risk distribution and its ecological drivers is needed. We aimed to map the spatial distribution of ticks and pathogen-infected ticks in central Hokkaido, Japan. Adult and nymphal ticks were collected with constant effort at 171 sites from 13 May to 26 June 2024, followed by screening tick-borne pathogens and ecological niche modeling. A total of 9,908 ticks were collected and the endemic tick-borne pathogens (i.e., tick-borne encephalitis virus, Yezo virus, Beiji nairovirus, Lyme disease group borreliae, and relapsing fever group borreliae) were primarily detected in Ixodes spp. ticks. Potential suitable habitats of the ticks and pathogens were predicted using the presence/absence data based on tick collection and pathogen detection. The models achieved acceptable predictive performance (median AUC = 0.83 and median TSS = 0.59 in leave-one-out cross‑validation). Ixodes persulcatus and Ixodes ovatus were identified as the primary ticks for determining the distributions of all the pathogens. Besides, the predicted suitable habitats differed among pathogen and tick species. Among the environmental variables considered for modeling, snow depth appeared to significantly contribute to the distribution differences between ticks and pathogens. The findings of this study expand our understanding of the spatial risk distribution of tick-borne pathogen infections and its ecological context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.