Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133689›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2026

Conducting mental health studies in Emergency Departments in England: Lessons learnt from a randomised controlled trial testing a brief psychological intervention for adults who self-harm.

Alexandra Elissavet Bakou, Giovanni Amati, Sally O'Keeffe, Tobit Emmens, Ashley Wilkie, Caroline Rowley, Rose McCabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra Elissavet BakouSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Population Health and Policy, City St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4813-7212
Giovanni AmatiSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Population Health and Policy, City St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-4298
Sally O'KeeffePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-2898
Tobit EmmensResearch and Development, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-9198
Ashley WilkieResearch and Development, Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Caroline RowleyMental Health Liaison Team, Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Rose McCabeSchool of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Population Health and Policy, City St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conducting mental health trials in busy EDs presents challenges, including record demand, bed shortages, 4-hour targets from arrival to discharge or admission, and staff shortages. This essay reflects on real-world challenges in a mental health trial involving people presenting to the ED with self-harm and/or suicidal thoughts and outlines lessons learned for future studies. No quantitative data will be reported. ASSURED is a randomised controlled clinical trial investigating the effectiveness of a brief psychological intervention for adults attending the ED with self-harm and/or suicidal thoughts. The original aims were to improve psychosocial assessments conducted by liaison psychiatry practitioners and to have the same practitioner deliver the intervention after discharge ensuring relational continuity. We worked with people with lived experience to address engagement challenges during mental health crises. 620 people across 14 EDs in England were recruited between 2022-2024. Although liaison psychiatry practitioners were trained to deliver the intervention, recruiting participants in crisis was difficult due to 4-hour targets and limited mental health research nurses. Delivering follow-up care post-discharge was challenging, as practitioners prioritised urgent assessments over delivering the follow-up intervention. However, it was feasible for researchers to recruit people within 1-2 weeks of ED attendance and for other mental health professionals to deliver the intervention. Flexibility in time and mode of delivery was paramount in participant engagement, which was mostly not achievable within liaison psychiatry roles. As many patients reattended the ED, experienced suicidal ideation or harmed themselves, supporting local clinical Principal Investigators to complete time-consuming paperwork in relation to these Serious/Adverse Events was helpful. ED liaison psychiatry teams face significant barriers to trial participation compared to other settings. Brief psychological interventions after ED attendance were more feasibly delivered by other practitioners such as assistant psychologists, and lived-experience advisors were central to ensuring sensitive engagement, approach and follow-up in research. Clinical Trial Number ISRCTN 13472559, Registered on 18 of November 2021.

Identifiers

PMID42133689
PMCPMC13175481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.