ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of an acrylic acid hydrogel dosimeter for 3-D dose verification in radiotherapy using MRI.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gel dosimeters are commonly used to verify the dose distribution and consequently, ensure the accurate delivery of the dose as planned, which is very critical for the success of the radiotherapy. The current study aims to investigate the feasibility of using the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based relaxation rate maps (R2 maps) of the novel acrylic acid with organic glucose polyvinyl alcohol (ACAGLPVA) hydrogel dosimeter for 3-D dose verification. The (ACAGLPVA) hydrogel was prepared and scanned with a 3-T MRI, prior to irradiation, using a spin-echo (SE) sequence. A series of 30 images with different echo times (TE) were acquired in order to generate R2 maps. The hydrogel was then irradiated with a maximum dose of 8 Gy using a CyberKnife system and the same MRI scans were acquired again for the irradiated gel phantom. The measured dose distributions obtained from R2-MRI maps were compared, using 2-D and 3-D Gamma analyses with 3% dose difference and 3-mm distance-to-agreement criteria, to those calculated from the treatment planning system (TPS). Results have shown high spatial agreement between the dose distributions calculated from TPS and the dose distributions derived from R2 maps, particularly in high-dose regions. The 3-D Gamma analysis achieved pass rates exceeding 90% across all planes for all evaluated dose levels-namely 90%, 70%, 50% and 20% of the maximum dose in the axial plane, as well as 90%, 70% and 50% of the maximum dose in the coronal and sagittal planes. In conclusion, based on the analysis of R2-MRI maps, this study has demonstrated the reliability of using the novel (ACAGLPVA) hydrogel dosimeter as an accurate tool for 3-D verification of radiotherapy treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.