ArticlePloS one2026
Multi-source technical assessment and turbine-based energy yield for offshore wind farms: A case study of the Algerian coast.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Offshore wind energy is now recognized as a promising and cost-effective approach to diversify energy sources and support environmental sustainability. However, despite Algeria's extensive coastline, offshore wind energy potential has not been fully investigated. The case study undertaken for this paper proposes a multi‑source, screening‑to‑yield workflow that combines open datasets to rank candidate offshore zones and to obtain turbine‑level performance, turbine specificity enters through the rotor equivalent wind speed (REWS) and through the power curve, while site dependence is governed by the three -parameters Weibull, the shear exponent and the air density. Potential sites are first screened using Global Wind Atlas wind maps and then refined using bathymetry constraints; extreme coastal wave height information is used to check operational clearance assumptions. Multi‑year ERA5 reanalysis is then employed to quantify wind climate and direction at different heights and to derive key atmospheric parameters at a common hub height including Weibull statistics, wind direction and shear exponent, and air density. In the turbine‑matching stage, the turbine‑specific REWS is computed to account for differences among four commercially available 3‑MW‑class turbines considering their power curves and technical specifications, and taking into account the coastal wave height data obtained from the Copernicus Marine Service for minimum turbine hub height selection, followed by air‑density correction prior to power‑curve mapping. Net annual energy production (Net AEP) and capacity factor are finally reported after applying an aggregated 15% loss factor. Results identify the most favorable zone which achieves a 2019-2021 mean net annual energy production of 10.397 GWh/yr and a net capacity factor of 39.56%, per turbine, aligning with global offshore wind performance standards. The proposed approach provides a cost-effective starting point for future offshore wind assessments. Further work should incorporate higher‑resolution modeling, wake/array effects, and uncertainty quantification to support project implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.