Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133632›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Optimizing breast cancer treatment strategies through fractional-order dynamics: A computational modeling approach.

Irshad Sikandar Jamadar, Krishna Kumar, Ambareen Khan, Sher Afghan Khan, Ahmad Aziz Alahmadi, Mamdooh Alwetaishi, Liew Tze Hui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irshad Sikandar JamadarDepartment of Applied Science and Humanities, MIT School of Computing, MIT-Art, Design and Technology University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7855-6892
Krishna KumarDepartment of Applied Science and Humanities, MIT School of Computing, MIT-Art, Design and Technology University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ambareen KhanCentre for Instructional Technology and Multimedia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Sher Afghan KhanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, IIUM, Gombak Campus, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0942-6621
Ahmad Aziz AlahmadiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Mamdooh AlwetaishiDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Liew Tze HuiCenter for Image and Vision Computing, COE for Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer treatment optimization is hindered by heterogeneity, resistance development, and differences among individuals. Most of the existing traditional mathematical models generally do not consider memory effects in biological systems. This may somewhat limit their predictive capability. Therefore, this study develops a fractional-order computational framework to capture tumor dynamics, immune responses, resistance mechanisms, and effects of thermal therapy regarding memory effects concerning their significance to treatment predictions. We considered the values of fractional order parameter ([Formula: see text]) which varied from 0.75 to 1.0 across five treatment protocols, and the analysis also included four patient populations. Efficacy was highest (32.26) with Continuous protocols at [Formula: see text] = 0.75. Specifically-optimized, patient-specific input yielded context-dependent patterns: Younger patients realized the maximum benefit (32.38) with Continuous therapy at [Formula: see text] = 0.80, while compromised patients had an optimum response (32.36) to Adaptive treatment performed at [Formula: see text] = 0.75. For older patients, the better result (31.82) was achieved using Continuous protocols at [Formula: see text] = 0.93. Parameter sensitivity analyses show that immune cytotoxic killing rate is the most effective parameter. In addition, treatment resistance parameters are among the five most sensitive. While aggregate differences between fractional-order and integer-order models remain small, context-specific improvements witnessed in certain patient-protocol combinations were as much as 3.68%. Fractional-order modeling thus creates a framework for investigating memory effects in cancer treatment, while actual clinical validation must establish whether such theoretical improvements indeed create a discernible increase in predictive accuracy in practice.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID42133632
PMCPMC13175390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.