ArticlePloS one2026
Cancer mutations in RAD51 and its paralogues.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The RAD51 recombinase is central to repair of DNA damage arising from stalled or collapsed replication forks and DNA double strand breaks. Its essential role is revealed by the fact that this function evolved in bacteria but was retained in eukaryotes. In humans some of the RAD51 functions have been relegated to several paralogues which evolved by gene duplication. In addition to mutations, most cancers are also characterized by increased chromosomal instability manifesting as translocations, deletions, insertions, and other more complex forms of chromosomal re-arrangements. Given the central role of RAD51 in protecting against chromosomal instability it stands to reason that RAD51 mutations that alter its function should register in cancer cells. However, pan-cancer analyses of analyzed cancer genomes show a marked absence of RAD51 loss of function mutations leading to a so-called "RAD51 paradox": increased chromosomal instability despite normal RAD51 function. One hypothesis is that mutations in the RAD51 paralogues may contribute to the genomic instability, meaning that a lack of mutations in RAD51 may be compensated by an increase of mutations in the paralogues. We queried analyzed cancer genomes from COSMIC and mapped all mutations in RAD51 and its paralogues. This revealed an increase in RAD51B, RAD51C and RAD51D paralogue mutations in human cancers. We used established algorithms to determine the probability that any mutation may affect enzyme function. Although, we did not find many "driver" mutations, numerous paralogue mutations were pathogenic or likely to destabilize enzyme function. In silico 3D structure analysis was then used to analyze the potential effect of some of these mutations on protein structure. Gene expression analysis did not reveal any changes in paralogue expression levels. Further, an evolutionary analysis did not uncover any selective pressure for mutations in RAD51 and its paralogues. A comparison of mutations reported on COSMIC with those reported on ClinVar revealed that many mutations primarily in RAD51C and RAD51D are also hereditary. Thus, it appears that an apparent low level of RAD51 mutations in cancer cells is compensated by an increase in paralogues mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.