ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Art's hidden topology: A window into human perception.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generations of researchers have sought a link between features of an artistic image and the audience's experience. However, a direct link between the properties of an image and the responses evoked has still not been established. Given the importance of shape to human perception and artistic creation, it can be assumed that one of the most important aspects of an artistic image is the use of different visual structures. We show that a method from the field of computational topology, persistent homology, can be used to analyse properties of image structures and composition at multiple scales. In order to determine the reliability of this method as a tool for analysing visual artworks, we analysed two different sets of abstract paintings that revealed significant discrepancies in the eye tracking, electrical brain activity and the subjective experience of viewers. Our research showed that our newly developed method not only clearly distinguished between two sets of images but also allowed us to map topological features onto gaze fixation heat maps. Furthermore, the extent to which various artistic images violate a topological duality (Alexander duality) is significantly different from that of pseudo-art. It is intriguing that a diverse group of eminent abstract artists seem to favour a special rate of violation close to a specific value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.