Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133603›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

EPOCA Tele-Monitoring System for Older Adults at High Risk of Hospitalization: Budget Impact and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Henri Leleu, Damien Testa, Mireille Dutech, Etienne Minvielle, Elise Cabanes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Henri LeleuPublic Health Expertise, 10 boulevard de Sébastopol, Paris, 75004, France, 33 1 85 09 09 49.ORCID 0000-0003-4930-6767
Damien TestaEpoca U&I, Nanterre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2603-5135
Mireille DutechEpoca U&I, Nanterre, France.ORCID 0009-0000-9892-855X
Etienne MinvielleInstitut Polytechnique de Paris, Centre de Recherche en Gestion de l'Ecole Polytechnique (I3-CRG, UMR CNRS 9217), Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8622-5558
Elise CabanesEpoca U&I, Nanterre, France.ORCID 0009-0007-0924-6348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: France's aging population faces high rates of chronic illness, multimorbidity, and avoidable hospitalizations, placing pressure on an already strained health care system. Remote monitoring systems have shown promise in improving care coordination and reducing acute care use. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the EPOCA remote monitoring system, implemented within the Vigie-Age framework, compared to the standard of care for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Methods: Using data from the Vigie-Age Article 51 pilot study (with 722 participants, including 408 participants with long-term follow-up), a cost-utility analysis was conducted over a 10-year lifetime horizon. A Markov model with daily cycles simulated transitions across health states: at home, emergency department visits, hospitalization, and death. Analyses were conducted from both the French National Health Insurance (NHI) and collective perspectives. Direct medical costs, including hospital, outpatient, and intervention costs, were included. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed model robustness. Results: EPOCA was associated with a reduction in emergency department visits by 54% and in hospitalizations by 46%, cutting the average hospital stay from 55.6 (SD 51.7) to 30.6 (SD 27.8) days. Total costs per patient were €29,165 (EUR €1=US $1.13) with EPOCA and €39,929 for standard of care, representing a €10,764 saving from the collective perspective and a €7,430 saving from the NHI perspective. EPOCA yielded 0.04 additional QALYs and remained cost-saving even at higher program costs. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. EPOCA had a 90% probability of being dominant and a 95% probability of being cost-effective at a €30,000 per QALY threshold. Conclusions: On the basis of currently available evidence, EPOCA may be a cost-effective strategy for older patients at high risk of hospitalization. It could reduce health care use while improving outcomes, supporting its integration into national older adult care pathways and reimbursement by the French NHI.

Indexed as

BudgetsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisHospitalizationTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseEmergency Room VisitsFemaleFranceHumansMaleMarkov ChainsPilot ProjectsQuality-Adjusted Life Yearsbudget impact analysiscost-effectivenessolder adultspatient remote monitoringpolypathology

Identifiers

PMID42133603
PMCPMC13175235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.