ArticlePloS one2026
The influence mechanism of micropore spatial distribution form on the methane desorption capability in selected Chinese coals.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study quantitatively investigates the pore structure of coals with different degrees of metamorphism to reveal the spatial distribution forms of micropores and their influence on methane desorption efficiency. The results show that, as coal degrees of metamorphism, the development degree, specific surface area, and pore volume of micropores first decrease and then increase, while mesopores first increase and then decrease, and macropores decrease. The connectivity of macropores declines with increasing coal degrees of metamorphism. Micropores dominate the specific surface area (>96.5%), whereas macropores contribute the most to total pore volume (>45.2%). The study further demonstrates that attached micropores, primarily found in lignite, enable methane to desorb directly into connected seepage channels, resulting in the highest desorption efficiency. Networked micropore clusters, prevalent in coking coal, hinder gas diffusion due to complex pathways, leading to moderate desorption efficiency. In anthracite, isolated micropores impede methane release, producing the lowest desorption efficiency. These findings provide mechanistic insights into the relationship between micropore spatial distribution and gas transport, highlighting the novelty of linking pore topology to desorption behavior. They have significant implications for coalbed methane (CBM) extraction and coal mine safety management, providing guidance on optimizing gas recovery and mitigating geological hazards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.