ArticlePLoS genetics2026
Spatiotemporal characterization of single-stranded DNA intermediates after UV irradiation: II. Rapid growth and effects of recA and recJ.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Irradiation of E. coli with UV light results in the formation of post-replication gaps and induction of the SOS response. Here, we investigate the dynamics of single strand gap formation and resolution in cells growing with a 50 min doubling time within specially designed microfluidic chips, making observations on fluorescent gap markers in individual cells over the course of 8 hours. In cells proficient for gap repair, irradiation with UV at 5 J/m2 triggers an immediate increase in the number and intensity of gap markers. Cells lacking recF, recO, or recA cannot repair gaps via the canonical gap repair pathway and exhibit elevated gap numbers and intensities over many hours. Major conclusions include: (1) Post-replication gaps are a major feature of DNA metabolism after UV irradiation. (2) The long-lived, high-intensity foci observed in recF, recO, or recA mutants are completely dependent on the RecJ nuclease. In the absence of other RecFOR pathway functions, RecJ-mediated enlargement of many gaps continues unabated for extended periods. (3) In the absence of RecA or other RecFOR pathway functions, cells accumulate repair intermediates that are bound by large numbers of SSB molecules. (4) In the absence of RecJ, other pathways, perhaps involving TLS, displace SSB in gaps. Our results also confirm, using a different experimental setup and protocol, that: (a) UV-related repair activities, including nucleotide excision repair of at least some lesions, may continue for multiple cell generations after exposure; and (b) we again see no evidence that RecF facilitates lesion skipping. Overall patterns of gap formation and resolution under rapid growth conditions are consistent with a burst of post-replication gap formation following UV irradiation, postulated in the accompanying report to rapidly trigger the SOS response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.