Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133577›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2026

Spatiotemporal characterization of single-stranded DNA intermediates after UV irradiation: II. Rapid growth and effects of recA and recJ.

Remy A A Ripandelli, Elizabeth A Wood, Andrew Robinson, Antoine M van Oijen, Michael M Cox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Remy A A RipandelliMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Elizabeth A WoodDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Andrew RobinsonMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Antoine M van OijenMolecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Michael M CoxDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3606-5722

Funding

Creation and Repair of Postreplicative DNA GapsRM1GM130450 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Michael M. Cox, MYRON GOODMAN · 2019 to 2026
$10.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS RM1 GM130450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irradiation of E. coli with UV light results in the formation of post-replication gaps and induction of the SOS response. Here, we investigate the dynamics of single strand gap formation and resolution in cells growing with a 50 min doubling time within specially designed microfluidic chips, making observations on fluorescent gap markers in individual cells over the course of 8 hours. In cells proficient for gap repair, irradiation with UV at 5 J/m2 triggers an immediate increase in the number and intensity of gap markers. Cells lacking recF, recO, or recA cannot repair gaps via the canonical gap repair pathway and exhibit elevated gap numbers and intensities over many hours. Major conclusions include: (1) Post-replication gaps are a major feature of DNA metabolism after UV irradiation. (2) The long-lived, high-intensity foci observed in recF, recO, or recA mutants are completely dependent on the RecJ nuclease. In the absence of other RecFOR pathway functions, RecJ-mediated enlargement of many gaps continues unabated for extended periods. (3) In the absence of RecA or other RecFOR pathway functions, cells accumulate repair intermediates that are bound by large numbers of SSB molecules. (4) In the absence of RecJ, other pathways, perhaps involving TLS, displace SSB in gaps. Our results also confirm, using a different experimental setup and protocol, that: (a) UV-related repair activities, including nucleotide excision repair of at least some lesions, may continue for multiple cell generations after exposure; and (b) we again see no evidence that RecF facilitates lesion skipping. Overall patterns of gap formation and resolution under rapid growth conditions are consistent with a burst of post-replication gap formation following UV irradiation, postulated in the accompanying report to rapidly trigger the SOS response.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsRec A RecombinasesDNA, BacterialDNA DamageDNA RepairDNA ReplicationExodeoxyribonucleasesSOS Response, GeneticsUltraviolet RaysDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coli ProteinsExodeoxyribonucleasesrecA protein, E coliRec A RecombinasesRecJ protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID42133577
PMCPMC13175385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.