Observational studyJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2026
Clinical Relevance of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Monitoring Kidney Transplant Rejection.
Observational study in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpreting Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA: From Performance to Decision.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key pointsDonor-derived cell-free DNA showed strong discriminative ability for rejection after kidney transplantation. Clinical interpretability was improved by calculating donor-derived cell-free DNA result-specific likelihood ratio and corresponding post-test rejection risk. We showed that donor-derived cell-free DNA testing could help reduce unnecessary kidney biopsies, delineating a key clinical context in a low rejection prevalence cohort.
backgroundOver the past 25 years, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has emerged as a noninvasive biomarker for detecting allograft rejection in kidney transplant recipients, yet its clinical interpretability and context(s) of use in post-transplant monitoring remain largely unexplored.
methodsIn this observational cohort study, we analyzed 472 retrospective and 450 prospective plasma samples as the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Samples were collected at the time of either an indication or a protocol kidney biopsy. We evaluated three logistic regression models for rejection discrimination: a clinical model, the dd-cfDNA alone, and their combination. Result-specific likelihood ratios were derived from the dd-cfDNA-based model probabilities and applied to the clinical model predictions to obtain post-test probabilities of rejection. By comparing pre-test and post-test probabilities, we assessed the impact of dd-cfDNA on rejection risk stratification.
resultsdd-cfDNA alone demonstrated strong discriminative ability, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.84) and 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.87) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Combining dd-cfDNA with clinical parameters improved the above area under the receiver operating characteristic curves to 0.82 and 0.87, respectively. We compared pre-test and post-test probabilities to determine how dd-cfDNA testing influenced rejection risk estimation. Incorporating dd-cfDNA testing results clarified risk stratification by reducing the number of samples categorized as intermediate (10%-30%) pre-test risk. Overall, 253/345 pre-test intermediate risk samples were reclassified, with 117/162 (72%) and 33/91 (36%) correctly assigned to low (≤10%) and high (≥30%) post-test risk, respectively. With 10% probability threshold for warranting a kidney biopsy, 482 biopsies would have been safely avoided using post-test probabilities, with 437 (91%) of these being protocol biopsies.
conclusionsOur study confirmed the strong association between dd-cfDNA% and rejection after kidney transplantation. Using test result-specific likelihood ratio, we evaluated the impact of integrating dd-cfDNA% for estimating time point-specific rejection risk, demonstrating its potential to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in a cohort with a relatively low rejection prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.