ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Refining a multimedia patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with low literacy.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with low literacy have difficulty completing patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). The Multimedia Adaptation Protocol (MAP) guides the process of adapting traditional PROMs to multimedia versions that patients with low literacy can self-administer. We previously executed the first MAP stage, forward adaptation, to adapt the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE) to a multimedia version (multimedia PROMIS-UE). The goal of this study was to refine the multimedia PROMIS-UE via the next MAP stages, back adaptation and qualitative evaluation, to result in a conceptually-equivalent, user-tested multimedia PROMIS-UE ready for psychometric validation. METHODOLOGY: For back adaptation, mixed-literacy and English-speaking participants masked to the PROMIS-UE "translated" multimedia components back to text. We compared text back-adaptations to the original PROMIS-UE, identified areas of non-equivalence, and updated the multimedia PROMIS-UE accordingly. For qualitative evaluation, we used an iterative design process to conduct cycles of testing to assess usability and face validity. We performed analyses including memo writing and framework-guided thematic analysis. Findings were synthesized into usability, functionality, or content-related themes that guided ideation workshops focused on identifying solutions.
resultsWe recruited 11 participants for back adaptation. We identified areas of non-equivalence between the PROMIS-UE and multimedia PROMIS-UE for 85% of the questions, which were addressed in an updated multimedia PROMIS-UE. We conducted two cycles of qualitative evaluation. We recruited 20 patients and identified 16 themes/challenges: animations unused, audio unused, instructions unclear, instructions unused, difficulty starting questionnaire, response audio button misinterpreted, difficulty with incomplete forms, difficulty submitting answers, purpose of avatars unclear, purpose of smiley scale unclear, difficulty differentiating smileys, inaccurate animation, unclear how to select answer, audio button unused or misinterpreted, confusion with scrolling, and incomplete popup window missed. We updated the multimedia PROMIS-UE after each cycle to address each theme.
conclusionsWe developed a conceptually-equivalent, user-tested multimedia PROMIS-UE ready to undergo psychometric testing and validation. This work represents an essential intermediary and preparatory phase of PROM development, is analogous to cross-cultural translation phases intentionally positioned prior to psychometric validation, and advances how PROMs can be adapted to a multimedia format. Ultimately, a validated multimedia PROMIS-UE will expand clinicians' and investigators' abilities to capture patient-reported outcomes in low literacy populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.