ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026
Immunological Drug-Drug Interactions in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Artificial Intelligence.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between opioid use and treatment discontinuation in patients receiving nivolumab: a real-world database study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Causal AI for cancer immunotherapy: a narrative framework review of target trial emulation, treatment-effect learning and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Elucidating the role of medicinal plants in melanoma treatment: a review on metastatic progression and phytochemical intervention.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy, producing durable responses across multiple malignancies. However, treatment outcomes may be influenced by immunological drug-drug interactions (DDIs) arising from commonly prescribed concomitant medications. Unlike classical pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic DDIs, these interactions operate through systemic mechanisms that modulate anti-tumour immunity, including alterations to the gut microbiome, immune signalling pathways, and the tumour microenvironment. This review proposes a conceptual framework for "immunological DDIs" (iDDIs), extending beyond metabolic interactions toward a system-level understanding of immune regulation. RECENT
findingsWe synthesise current evidence on commonly used medication classes-organised by their primary immunological mechanisms: (1) gut microbiome-mediated effects, (2) systemic immunosuppression, and (3) tumour microenvironment modulation-and their impact on ICI efficacy and safety. Meta-analyses suggest that certain medications, particularly antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors, are associated with poorer clinical outcomes, although confounding by indication and disease severity remain important limitations. Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging approach to detect and characterise complex DDIs using large-scale clinical and real-world data. Natural language processing, machine learning models, and large language models show potential for extracting medication exposure, predicting adverse events, and supporting clinical decision-making. Most AI applications remain at an early stage, with limited external validation and uncertain clinical utility. Future research should integrate mechanistic biology, prospective clinical studies, and explainable AI approaches to improve identification of iDDIs and optimise the safe and effective use of ICIs in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.