ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Early olfactory pre-conditioning during sensitive developmental periods is associated with enhanced detection performance in working dogs.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early olfactory imprinting has been proposed as a strategy to enhance the performance of detection dogs, yet empirical evidence from operational contexts remains limited. This study evaluated the effects of early exposure to target odours on four core detection variables: sensitivity under tight-containment conditions, reaction distance, work endurance, and detection reliability. Twenty operational adult dogs served as controls, and four dogs underwent an early-learning protocol beginning during sensitive stages of neurosensory development. All dogs completed parallel test batteries under equivalent conditions, and data were analysed using Welch's t-tests with effect size estimation. Dogs exposed to early imprinting showed higher detection sensitivity in tight-containment conditions and reacted to the target odour at substantially greater distances than control dogs. Work endurance was also higher in early-learning dogs, which maintained effective performance for extended periods compared to conventionally trained dogs. In contrast, false-positive behaviour did not differ between groups, indicating that response inhibition and decision control were not modified by early imprinting alone. Taken together, the findings indicate that early olfactory imprinting is associated with improvements in detection sensitivity, reaction distance, and work endurance, while detection reliability remains unchanged. These results suggest potential benefits of integrating early imprinting protocols into breeding and training programmes for detection dogs and highlight the need for larger, controlled studies to further characterise their developmental and practical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.