Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133142›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Contract architecture and time-to-first public activation of robotic urology programs in Poland: a nationwide open-data linkage study.

Rafał Bogdan Drobot, Mateusz Władysław Jobczyk, Maciej Wojciech Przudzik, Bartosz Brzoszczyk, Marcin Jarzemski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rafał Bogdan DrobotUrology Department, Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Bursztynowa 2, Warsaw, 04-479, Poland. r.drobot@uksw.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2627-298X
Mateusz Władysław JobczykDepartment of General, Oncological and Laparoscopic Urology, John Paul II Provincial Hospital, Bełchatów, Poland.
Maciej Wojciech PrzudzikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Bartosz BrzoszczykDepartment of Urology, Jan Biziel University Hospital in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Torun, Poland.
Marcin JarzemskiDepartment of Urology, Jan Biziel University Hospital in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Torun, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public announcements of robot purchases are often treated as equivalent to new robotic-urology capacity, although procurement disclosure and stable public activity are different milestones. We assessed whether contract architecture helps interpret public activation of robotic urology programs in Poland. We conducted a nationwide open-data linkage study linking the CEZ/NFZ provider-level reimbursement workbook for robotic surgery in Poland (April 2022-June 2025) with auditable Polish da Vinci disclosures (February 2024-March 2026), an exact-PDF subset, and a fixed public Synektik page naming 42 hospitals. First public reimbursement was treated as a proxy for first publicly visible activation. Analyses included segmented diffusion modelling, rolling-origin validation, trajectory clustering, and exploratory contract-architecture clustering. Poland had 56 providers with any public robotic surgery and 53 with public RARP across 14 regions. Median first-month public RARP volume was 6 cases and median first-6-month volume was 54. A segmented Poisson model outperformed a single-trend model (AIC 119.6 vs. 138.1), with the best breakpoint in November 2022 and 24.3% lower rolling-origin predictive deviance. Among 12 urology-linked disclosures, 7 of 11 capital acquisitions occurred at active public RARP sites, 4 were likely de novo public entries, and 1 was a maintenance event. In the exact-PDF subset (n = 8), contract phenotype did not separate likely de novo from already active sites. In a mature public robotic-urology market, procurement notices more often signalled scaling or continuity within the public reimbursement layer than first public activation. Contract data became informative only after linkage to downstream public activity.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrologyHumansPolandTime FactorsDiffusion of innovationHospitals, PublicProstatectomyRobotic surgical proceduresTechnology assessment, biomedicalUrologic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID42133142
PMCPMC13176067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.