ReviewVeterinary research communications2026
Integrating biomarkers and artificial intelligence for precision diagnostics in cattle health and herd management: a review.
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstructing bovine disease trajectories through integrative multi-omics: molecular decision nodes, predictive biomarkers and precision intervention.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate diagnosis of major production diseases in cattle, many of which may be subclinical, such as mastitis, ketosis, and bovine respiratory disease (BRD), is essential for herd efficiency, animal welfare, and long-term sustainability. Conventional diagnostic approaches based on clinical observation and microbiological assays often lack sensitivity for early-stage detection and show limited predictive value in multifactorial conditions, thereby limiting early risk stratification and timely intervention. Biomarkers derived from accessible matrices such as blood and milk provide valuable insight into inflammatory, metabolic, and reproductive disturbances, especially at subclinical stages. However, their clinical implementation remains limited by pre-analytical and analytical variability (e.g., sample collection, storage, and processing), the absence of standardized thresholds, and the lack of reliable cow-specific decision cut-offs. The integration of multi-omics data, including genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic layers, with artificial intelligence (AI) enables high-dimensional data integration, automated classification, and predictive modeling in cattle health. While AI-driven approaches show promise in supporting biomarker network interpretation, their translation from predictive modeling frameworks to clinically validated diagnostic systems remains limited. This review critically synthesizes current evidence on the utility and limitations of biomarkers and AI-assisted diagnostics in cattle health management, while identifying key methodological constraints and outlining practical pathways toward standardized and interpretable AI-driven systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.