Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133137›Full record

ReviewVeterinary research communications2026

Integrating biomarkers and artificial intelligence for precision diagnostics in cattle health and herd management: a review.

Şeyma Aydın, Selçuk Özdemir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Şeyma AydınDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5640-3363
Selçuk ÖzdemirDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye. selcuk.ozdemir@atauni.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7539-0523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early and accurate diagnosis of major production diseases in cattle, many of which may be subclinical, such as mastitis, ketosis, and bovine respiratory disease (BRD), is essential for herd efficiency, animal welfare, and long-term sustainability. Conventional diagnostic approaches based on clinical observation and microbiological assays often lack sensitivity for early-stage detection and show limited predictive value in multifactorial conditions, thereby limiting early risk stratification and timely intervention. Biomarkers derived from accessible matrices such as blood and milk provide valuable insight into inflammatory, metabolic, and reproductive disturbances, especially at subclinical stages. However, their clinical implementation remains limited by pre-analytical and analytical variability (e.g., sample collection, storage, and processing), the absence of standardized thresholds, and the lack of reliable cow-specific decision cut-offs. The integration of multi-omics data, including genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic layers, with artificial intelligence (AI) enables high-dimensional data integration, automated classification, and predictive modeling in cattle health. While AI-driven approaches show promise in supporting biomarker network interpretation, their translation from predictive modeling frameworks to clinically validated diagnostic systems remains limited. This review critically synthesizes current evidence on the utility and limitations of biomarkers and AI-assisted diagnostics in cattle health management, while identifying key methodological constraints and outlining practical pathways toward standardized and interpretable AI-driven systems.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersCattle DiseasesAnimalsCattleMultiomicsBiomarkersArtificial intelligenceBiomarkersCattle diseasesMulti-omicsPrecision livestock health

Identifiers

PMID42133137
PMCPMC13176182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.