SynthesisPlant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2026
Comparison of Disinfection Methods for Controlling Microbial Contamination of Edible Sprouts: A Qualitative Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sprouts, due to their high nutritional value and suitable environmental conditions during the germination process, are an ideal medium for the growth of pathogenic microorganisms. Primary sprout contamination usually occurs through seeds and post-harvest washing. Therefore, effective seed and sprout disinfection can be an essential requirement for the food safety of edible sprouts. In this systematic review, 146 studies published between 2010 and 2024 were evaluated, and the effectiveness of different chemical and non-chemical disinfection methods was investigated. In traditional chemical methods, which usually use sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)/calcium hypochlorite (Ca (OCl)₂) and hydrogen peroxide, a reduction in microbial load was observed, but there are disadvantages, such as possible negative effects on seed viability and quality. There are concerns about chemical residues and their effectiveness against pathogens internalized or protected in biofilms is limited. However, chlorine dioxide has been introduced as a promising alternative, which has higher oxidation power, lower dependence on pH, and produces fewer carcinogenic byproducts. Non-chemical methods have also received much attention due to better preservation of seed quality and the absence of chemical residues. Physical and biological non-chemical methods are also effective in disinfection. However, the most effective strategy is the combination of several methods, called "Hurdle" technology. This multiple-stress approach overwhelms the repair mechanisms of the microorganism and leads to further microbial reduction, reduced side effects on the seed and sprout, and increased overall efficiency. On the other hand, the use of hurdle technology is the most promising approach of procuring the best possible safety at the same time as keeping the quality and germination of the end product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42133136What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.