ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2026
Exposure to Global Burden of Disease dietary factors and risk of recurrent depressive symptoms: the prospective Whitehall II cohort study.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDespite growing evidence related diet quality to depression, the extent to which the dietary risk factors proposed by the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) are associated with depression at international level remains unknow. To address this gap, a harmonised protocol has been developed by the Global Burden of Disease Lifestyle And mental Disorder (GLAD) project and we aimed to contribute to the GLAD project by assessing associations between the 15 Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) dietary risk factors, and ultra processed foods (UPF) intakes-and recurrence of depressive symptoms (DepS) over 13 years of follow-up in the British Whitehall II study.
methodsAnalyses carried out on 4099 participants with no prior history of DepS (73.6% men, mean age = 61.2; SD = 5.9 years) and available assessment of dietary exposures derived from Food-Frequency questionnaire in 2002/04. Recurrent DepS was defined as having DepS in at least two of the four repeated measurements between 2002-2004 and 2015-2016, with DepS assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (score ≥ 16) or use of antidepressants.
resultsAfter adjusting for sex, age and socio-economic status, results of logistic regression showed that each increase of 1 standard deviation of fruit consumption (228 g) and fibre intake (7.4 g) was associated with 17% and 15% lower odds of recurrent DepS respectively (OR
conclusionOf the 16-GBD dietary factors, only fruit and fiber showed consistent associations with lower odds of recurrent depressive symptoms in the Whitehall II study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42133131What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.