ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Classification of occlusal caries severity using spectrophotometric CIELAB measurements and machine learning algorithms.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluated whether spectrophotometric CIELAB color measurements can support machine-learning (ML) classification of occlusal caries severity based on ICDAS categories.
methodsThree hundred extracted human teeth were visually classified using ICDAS (0-4) and served as labels for supervised learning. Five occlusal sites per tooth were measured using a spectrophotometer under standardized conditions. Site-level CIELAB values were transformed into engineered color features and aggregated at the tooth level. Teeth were categorised as sound (ICDAS 0), initial carious lesions (1-2), and moderate carious lesions (3-4). Five ML models: Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, CatBoost, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and a Deep Sets architecture were trained. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, balanced accuracy (BA), and macro-F1, with additional binary analyses for early (ICDAS 1-4 vs. 0) and operative lesion detection (ICDAS 3-4 vs. 0-2), based on the included ICDAS range. Learning curve analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of training data size on model performance.
resultsDeep Sets achieved the highest multiclass performance (BA = 0.89) followed by the MLP (BA = 0.72). Tree-based models demonstrated lower performance overall. For early lesion detection, all models showed high sensitivity (SE) but reduced specificity (SP). At the operative level, the MLP achieved 100% SE and moderate SP. Learning-curve analysis showed that neural models benefited most from increased training data, whereas tree-based models showed limited improvement.
conclusionUnder controlled in-vitro conditions, spectrophotometric CIELAB measurements enabled machine-learning classification of occlusal caries severity. Deep sets achieved the highest overall performance, supporting the potential of color-based approaches as adjunctive tools for caries assessment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Spectrophotometric tooth color measurements may support machine learning classification of occlusal caries severity under controlled conditions, using an image-independent approach. Such color-based methods may complement visual assessment by providing a more standardized and reproducible evaluation of enamel changes following further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.