ReviewWorld journal of urology2026
Present and future of ureteral stent technology: a review by the EAU endourology section.
Review in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUreteral stents are essential in routine urologic practice for maintaining urinary drainage and preventing obstruction. Traditional stents are often associated with pain, urinary symptoms, encrustation, infection, and the need for secondary removal procedures. In theory, an "ideal" ureteral stent would address these challenges. This scoping review summarizes contemporary advancements in ureteral stent technology, including innovations in material and design, functional mechanisms, coating systems, and drug elution. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn electronic literature search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library using MeSH terms from inception to August 2025. Screening and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. All studies reporting on technological innovations and advancements in ureteral stent design aimed at improving clinical outcomes and reducing patient morbidity were included.
resultsOf the 1407 identified studies, 62 were included in the final review. The included studies were categorized into the following specific categories: stent material, design, and positioning, anti-reflux mechanisms, biodegradable stents, stent removal innovations, stent coatings and drug-eluting systems.
conclusionDespite substantial advancements in stent technology, no universal "ideal" stent exists. Contemporary advancements in ureteral stent technology span across multiple domains, including innovations in stent material and design, anti-reflux mechanisms, biodegradable systems, stent coatings, and drug-eluting systems. Future ureteral stent development is anticipated to focus on patient-specific customization. Continued translational research and clinical validation are required to integrate many of these ureteral stent innovations into routine urological practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42133084What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.