ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
A bibliometric analysis of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2005-2024): mapping the knowledge landscape and future trends.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has become central to the surgical management of esophageal cancer, yet a comprehensive bibliometric overview of this evolving field is lacking. This study aims to map the research landscape, identify key contributors and trends, and forecast future directions in MIE.
methodsA literature search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) for publications from 2005 to 2024. Bibliometric analysis was performed using Bibliometrix (via Biblioshiny), VOSviewer, and CiteSpace to analyze publication trends, collaborations, influential entities, and keyword.
resultsWe identified 1427 English articles and reviews. Annual publications peaked in 2022. China, Japan, the USA, and the Netherlands were the most productive countries, with the Netherlands achieving the highest citation impact. Collaborative networks were primarily intra-national. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques and Diseases of the Esophagus were core journals, while seminal RCTs appeared in high-impact journals like The Lancet. Keyword analysis revealed four major clusters: Robot-assisted MIE (RAMIE), thoracoscoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy, neoadjuvant therapy for squamous cell carcinoma, and the Ivor Lewis technique. Research trends evolved from techniques/complications to neoadjuvant and immunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
conclusionsThis first comprehensive bibliometric study of MIE confirms its established status, with RAMIE and immunotherapy as current hotspots. Future advancement hinges on large-scale, multinational RCTs and long-term outcome studies. This analysis provides a foundational map to guide research priorities and foster global collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.