Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42133063›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2026

Transforming animal study toxicology reports into structured, harmonized data using large language models.

Tatyana Y Doktorova, Ilya Schneider Chernov, Alberto Formaggio, Xiaochen Zheng, Alvaro Serra, Preethi Latha Bhavani Mohan, Guillemette Duchateau-Nguyen, Dragomir Ivanov Draganov, Matt Hayes, Catrin Hasselgren and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Tatyana Y Doktorova *Predictive Modelling, pRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland. tatyana.doktorova@roche.com.ORCID 0009-0004-2961-9808
Ilya Schneider Chernov *Predictive Modelling, pRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Alberto FormaggioPredictive Modelling, pRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Xiaochen ZhengPredictive Modelling, pRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Alvaro SerraPredictive Modelling, pRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Preethi Latha Bhavani MohanPredictive Modelling, pRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Guillemette Duchateau-NguyenComputational Sciences Center of Excellence, gRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Dragomir Ivanov DraganovComputational Sciences Center of Excellence, gRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Matt HayesComputational Toxicology, Translational Safety, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Catrin HasselgrenComputational Toxicology, Translational Safety, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Vishal B SiramshettyComputational Toxicology, Translational Safety, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Stefano GaudioPASS, pRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Marco TecillaPASS, pRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Pierre MaliverPASS, pRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Eunice MusvasvaTSAC, pRED, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Lennart T AngerComputational Toxicology, Translational Safety, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical toxicology study reports contain the expert interpretations required to distinguish test article-related effects from incidental findings, yet these conclusions often remain embedded in unstructured text form that limit systematic reuse and integration with computational safety approaches. To address this gap, we developed a Large Language Model (LLM) - supported pipeline that converts toxicology reports into structured, machine-readable datasets harmonized with SEND terminology. The pipeline combines automated document preprocessing, section identification, schema-constrained information extraction, and semantic harmonization, complemented by targeted human curation. We evaluated the system performance using 200 Roche toxicology study reports, encompassing clinical pathology, histopathology, organ weights, exposure data, and study-level conclusions. Across domains, extraction performance was strong, characterized by consistently high sensitivity and precision for most parameters. Histopathology, organ weight, and NOAEL-related endpoints demonstrated the greatest robustness, with sensitivity typically above 95% and precision frequently exceeding 97%. Lower performance for parameters such as route of administration and substance identifiers reflected heterogeneous reporting practices rather than LLM-based method limitations. The structured datasets generated by this pipeline enable cross-study querying, identification of compounds with defined toxicological liabilities, integration with raw SEND data, and development of high-quality labels for predictive toxicology models. Practical utility has been demonstrated through representative use cases. These results demonstrate that LLM-assisted extraction can reliably capture expert toxicological interpretations at scale and provide a foundation for data-centric safety assessment, strategic decisions, reverse and forward translational toxicology research.

Indexed as

ToxicologyAnimalsDatabases, FactualData MiningHumansLarge Language ModelsAnimal study reportsLLM-supported text extractionTreatment-related findings

Identifiers

PMID42133063
PMCPMC13453989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.