ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Treatment stability comparison among different ADD-ON therapies in fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients: the role of clinical and demographic factors.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMotor fluctuations represent a major challenge in Parkinson's disease (PD) management. To address them, ADD-ON therapies with monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) and catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors are used to enhance and prolong dopaminergic effects of levodopa, thereby improving motor fluctuations. Despite widespread use, real-life comparative data remain limited.
methodsWe performed a retrospective, longitudinal study including PD patients referred to two Italian tertiary movement disorder centers. Patients with motor fluctuations requiring ADD-ON therapy (selegiline [SL], rasagiline [RS], safinamide [SF], or opicapone [OP]) and ≥ 12 months of follow-up were included. The primary outcome was treatment stability, defined as months without significant therapy modifications or ADD-ON discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included levodopa dosage changes, initiation of other antiparkinsonian therapies, and ADD-ON discontinuation rates. Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses evaluated the influence of ADD-ON type and clinical-demographic variables on treatment stability.
resultsWe analyzed 169 patients (SL = 20; RS = 26; SF = 78; OP = 45). Groups differed in age at ADD-ON initiation (p = 0.020; RS > OP), disease duration (p = 0.002; OP > RS and SF), and baseline levodopa equivalent daily dose (p = 0.003; SF and OP > RS). No significant differences in treatment stability were found between groups (p = 0.29). SF group showed higher levodopa increases (p = 0.02) and initiation of new therapies (p = 0.02). ADD-ON discontinuation occurred in 23.1% of patients, mainly due to AEs (16.6%). Cox regression showed no significant predictors of treatment stability.
conclusionsAll ADD-ON therapies showed comparable treatment stability and tolerability. No statistically significant sex-related differences were observed, although a trend toward more frequent therapy modifications was found in female patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42133014What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.