ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPelvic floor disorders are common in pregnancy and after childbirth. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is first-line conservative care, but the added value of feedback and the effect of timing (pregnancy vs postpartum) remain unclear. This systematic review evaluated PFMT with and without feedback in pregnant and postpartum women.
methodsOvid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2005 and December 2025. Trials enrolling pregnant or postpartum women and comparing PFMT (with or without feedback) with usual care or no intervention were included. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and risk of bias using the RoB 2 tool. The primary outcome was PFM strength. Meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean differences (SMD).
resultsTwenty-six trials were included. PFMT improved PFM strength (SMD 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74 to 2.05; I
conclusionsPelvic floor muscle training improves PFM strength and may reduce urinary symptoms during pregnancy and postpartum. Feedback enhances training accuracy and adherence, supporting structured implementation rather than superior physiological effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42133004What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.