Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42132923›Full record

Trial reportDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2026

Health-related quality of life comparing standard and prolonged time-to-surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: results from the multicenter, randomized, controlled NeoRes II trial.

Anders Holmén, Fahad Murad, Klara Nilsson, Ioannis Rouvelas, Mats Lindblad, Eva Szabo, Ingvar Halldestam, Ulrika Smedh, Bengt Wallner, Jan Johansson and 15 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Anders HolménDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fahad MuradDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Klara NilssonDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ioannis RouvelasDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0774-1904
Mats LindbladDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3575-6986
Eva SzaboDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Ingvar HalldestamDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden.
Ulrika SmedhDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bengt WallnerDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Jan JohanssonDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6564-6265
Gjermund JohnsenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Eirik Kjus AahlinDepartment of GI and HPB Surgery, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Hans-Olaf JohannessenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Gabriella Alexandersson von DöbelnDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Geir Olav HjortlandDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Naining WangDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ying ShangDepartment of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
David BorgDepartment of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Alexander QuaasInstitute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-6011
Isabel BartellaDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane BrunsDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Wolfgang SchröderDepartment of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Magnus NilssonDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6215-8132
Fredrik KlevebroDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1695-4103
Berit SundeDivision of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3506-9166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard time-to-surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer has historically been 4-6 weeks. Observational studies have suggested improved oncological outcomes and health-related quality of life in patients after prolonged time-to-surgery. This study aimed to investigate whether prolonged time-to-surgery is associated with improved health-related quality of life compared to the standard interval. This study is a secondary endpoint analysis within the NeoRes II trial, in which patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer were randomized to either standard time-to-surgery (4-6 weeks) or prolonged time-to-surgery (10-12 weeks). The primary endpoints have been reported previously. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25 questionnaires at time of diagnosis, preoperatively, and at 6-months and 1-5 years postoperatively. A total of 249 patients were randomized of whom 192 were available for health-related quality of life analyses, with 97 (51%) assigned to standard time-to-surgery and 95 (49%) to prolonged time-to-surgery. The groups were well-matched regarding baseline characteristics. Preoperatively, within a week of the day of surgery, patients in the prolonged time-to-surgery group reported better global quality of life, improved physical functioning, and less fatigue, coughing, dysphagia, odynophagia, pain, discomfort, and weight loss compared to those in the standard time-to-surgery group. These benefits were observed at 6 months postoperatively, but not thereafter during follow-up, where no significant differences were observed. Although prolonged time-to-surgery was associated with better preoperative health-related quality of life, no such benefits were observed postoperatively. In addition, the results from the primary endpoint analysis suggested that longer time-to-surgery was associated with worse oncological outcomes. This, together with the results of the current sub-study, strongly supports that the standard time-to-surgery of 4-6 weeks should be recommended after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyNeoadjuvant TherapyQuality of LifeTime-to-TreatmentAgedChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeesophageal cancerhealth-related quality of lifeneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapytime-to-surgery

Identifiers

PMID42132923
PMCPMC13174271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.