ArticleTrends in hearing
Localization of Free-Field Sound Sources in the Chronic Phase of Mild Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Localization of Free-Field Sound Sources in the Chronic Phase of Mild Ischemic Stroke.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate sound localization relies on the transformation of binaural cues into stable spatial representations, yet the neural mechanisms supporting this process remain incompletely understood. Mild stroke provides a unique opportunity to study the vulnerability of auditory spatial processing within distributed neural networks. We investigated azimuthal sound localization in chronic-phase survivors of mild stroke without hearing aid use using broadband, low-frequency, and high-frequency noise and compared it against a headphone-based lateralization task. Most patients exhibited localization accuracy comparable to healthy listeners. However, 4 of 14 patients showed a striking alteration of auditory spatial perception: instead of a continuous mapping of azimuth, responses clustered into bi- or trimodal (left-center-right) categorical patterns. Comparable deficits were also observed in one of the five age-matched control participants. To our knowledge, such localization patterns have not been reported in listeners without neurological disease. Atypical localization was most pronounced with low-frequency stimuli, suggesting a different role of the respective binaural cues in forming a spatial representation of sound. Differences between loudspeaker-based localization and existing headphone-based lateralization data further suggest that these paradigms engage distinct auditory spatial representations. The findings support the view that auditory space is constructed through higher-order, supramodal spatial mechanisms that are particularly vulnerable to right-hemispheric damage. Overall, the data highlight the challenges of quantifying spatial hearing of stroke survivors both on an individual and on a population level. Challenges include previously undocumented stimulus and method dependencies, an unknown mixing of auditory and neurological factors, and the absence of normative data for a nonstroke control cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.