ArticleJournal of radiation research2026
Effects of materials and beam currents on ozone generation in proton beam irradiation: a phantom study.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some patients undergoing radiation therapy have been reported to experience olfactory sensation. Radiation-induced ozone generation has been proposed as a potential cause, yet the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Previous studies have focused on ozone generation in photon- and electron-beam environments; however, data specific to proton beams remain limited. Using proton irradiation, we measured ozone concentrations at four clinically used beam currents (50, 100, 150 and 200 nA) and under material conditions. A custom-designed phantom was developed to investigate ozone generation during proton beam irradiation using three materials: air, water and bolus. Before conducting the main measurements, we used a high-sensitivity ozone monitor to assess the background ozone concentration in the treatment room over two treatment days, averaging 1.26 ± 0.97 ppb, which is substantially lower than clinically accepted safety thresholds. In air, ozone concentration increased linearly with beam current (R2 = 0.992, P = 0.004), reaching a maximum of 33.60 ppb and a mean of 13.47 ± 2.08 ppb at 200 nA. Water conditions also followed a linear increase (R2 = 0.988, P = 0.006), albeit at a more gradual rate compared to air, with a mean of 8.69 ± 1.12 ppb at 200 nA. However, bolus conditions showed no linear relationship (R2 = 0.081, P = 0.715), with a mean of 8.57 ± 0.87 ppb at 200 nA. Our findings indicate that moisture and airflow can affect ozone concentrations during proton therapy and provide foundational data for elucidating the relationship between ozone levels and patient-reported olfactory sensation in further clinical investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.