ArticleJournal of radiation research2026
Prioritizing radiotherapy infrastructure in depopulating societies: a 2050 blueprint from Akita, Japan.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In super-aged and depopulating societies, repeated travel requirements for radiotherapy (RT) can amplify geographic inequities in access to advanced techniques. The aim of this study was to determine optimal placement of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-capable facilities in Akita Prefecture-a leading-edge case of Japan's demographic transition-using p-median optimization under population projections through 2050. Using 1-km mesh population data for 2020 and official projections for 2030, 2040 and 2050, we calculated one-way automobile travel times from each mesh centroid to RT facilities with the Open Source Routing Machine based on OpenStreetMap road data. A 60-min travel-time threshold defined access coverage. IMRT-capable facilities were identified from official insurance-designation lists. Optimal placement was determined using a population-weighted p-median model, with the number of facilities prespecified as one per 200 000 population. In 2020, 10 external-beam RT facilities provided near-universal 60-min coverage (99.99%; mean 12.8 min), whereas the single IMRT-capable facility covered only 70.3% (uncovered 285 273; mean 42.5 min). Optimized placement with five IMRT-capable facilities increased coverage to 99.99% (uncovered 89) and reduced mean travel time to 14.2 min. Under population projections, optimized placement maintained >99% coverage through 2050 with three facilities, and three core locations were consistently selected across all time horizons. These temporally stable core locations can serve as priority targets for long-term IMRT infrastructure investment in aging and depopulating regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.