ArticleFaraday discussions2026
Article in Faraday discussions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The importance of cluster-size effects in heterogeneous catalysis is now well recognized. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is an obvious technique to study size-dependent changes in the chemical composition and electronic structure of catalyst nanoparticles. However, as XPS is an averaging technique based on the detection of electrons, experiments require a narrow distribution of cluster size and a conducting homogeneous support in order to avoid sample charging, which would prevent accurate measurements of chemical shifts. Traditional methods of catalyst synthesis by impregnation/calcination of support powders lead to very large particle size distributions (typically ±50%) and insulating samples. They therefore fail both of the above criteria and make it extremely difficult to extract precise sample characterisation. Here we present an alternative approach designed to enable XPS analysis in vacuum and under reaction conditions, whereby: (i) nanoparticles are synthesized by gas condensation and passed through a mass filter, which allows size selection in the range of 1 to 10 000 atoms with typically ±4% accuracy; (ii) these particles are deposited onto a thin Al
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.