ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Evaluating the Molecular Potential and Interpretability of DNA in Historical Spirit Collection Media.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancements in historical genomics increasingly leverage museum collections to study past ecosystems, species interactions and biodiversity. Formalin-fixed, ethanol-preserved specimens, once thought inaccessible to molecular analyses due to DNA degradation, are emerging as valuable genomic resources. If recoverable and reliably attributable, DNA within preservation media could provide a non-destructive alternative to conventional tissue sampling, with the potential to expand molecular access to valuable or irreplaceable specimens. We tested whether preservation media contains recoverable DNA suitable for taxonomic inference. We coupled passive adsorption and active filtration of specimen media with hot alkaline lysis DNA extraction followed by metabarcoding and shotgun metagenomics. DNA was recoverable across samples, including 41 of 61 (~67%) targets in a composite sample. However, detections were dominated by non-target taxa, indicating that preservation media retain a layered mixture of specimen-derived DNA and broader collection-level background. Detection success tracked with preservation chemistry (near-neutral pH and low residual formaldehyde) rather than specimen age. Method choice influenced detections: active filtration increased target detections but admitted more background; passive capture was sparser but more selective; shotgun sequencing retrieved broader vertebrate signals, including reptiles, but was heavily enriched for non-targets. Because both target and non-target taxa were often abundant, read-abundance cut-offs were unreliable for attribution. Spirit-media DNA is therefore best interpreted as a collection-level signal and a screening tool to identify jars with molecular potential (e.g., taxa of conservation or biosecurity interest), rather than as a definitive non-destructive proxy for specimen identity. Prioritising chemically favourable jars and implementing rigorous contamination controls should improve signal interpretability and help unlock the value of preservation media for historical genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.