ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Contemporary Overview of Aortic Regurgitation in Young Individuals: Insights From Real-Life Evidence.
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic regurgitation (AR) in young adults (aged 18-44 years) is often under- or misdiagnosed and is not always benign. As in older populations, prognosis depends on the severity of regurgitation, the underlying cause, early left ventricular dysfunction, and the chosen intervention strategy. Prompt diagnosis and timely treatment improve outcomes, yet the optimal timing for surgery in asymptomatic chronic AR remains uncertain. Recent studies have proposed new thresholds for left ventricular structural and functional assessment to better evaluate the impact of AR on prognosis and guide intervention timing. Echocardiography remains the primary imaging modality, but a multimodality approach is essential to accurately assess AR severity and subtle left ventricular changes. Transesophageal echocardiography with 3-dimensional imaging is crucial for evaluating valve repair feasibility, particularly when valve-sparing root repair, reintervention, or transcatheter procedures are considered. Additional tools such as cardiac magnetic resonance, global longitudinal strain, and biomarkers may further enhance disease monitoring. Assessment can be challenging, especially with eccentric jets or complex valve anatomy, and current surgical cut-offs remain debated. Aortic valve repair is preferred in young patients, including those with concomitant proximal aortic aneurysm, but it remains underutilized. Here, we propose a treatment algorithm for severe AR in young adults, integrating the underlying cause, valve anatomy, and left ventricular function, with a special focus on multimodality imaging to guide monitoring and therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.