ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Continental-wide prioritization of protected areas to address global and habitat-specific goals for avian biodiversity conservation.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continental-wide prioritization of protected areas to address global and habitat-specific goals for avian biodiversity conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The United Nations and European Union have set ambitious conservation goals to halt and reverse declines in biodiversity by protecting 30% of land and sea areas by 2030. Effective conservation planning requires evidence-based spatial prioritization to maximize the coverage of species within designated protected areas. Based on a pan-European database for occurrence and abundance of breeding birds collected in the 2010s, we applied the Zonation algorithm to identify key areas that would maximize the protection of ranges and populations for 435 species of breeding birds across Europe using either continental or national prioritization targets. When 30% of Europe's highest priority terrestrial areas were selected by the algorithm, 49% of species' ranges and 63% of species' populations were protected. When 10% and 30% of the highest priority lands were selected, compared with prioritization using occurrence data, prioritization using abundance data resulted in a higher percentage of species' populations, especially rare and range-restricted species, being represented for protected area coverage. Stratifying prioritization by habitat criteria greatly enhanced habitat-specific conservation efficiency, enabling coverage of over 80% of breeding bird species' populations in tundra, Mediterranean, and coastal habitats with a selection of 10% of the highest priority areas for each. Our prioritization supports international targets adopted under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework by identifying key areas and providing a roadmap to guide optimal site protection and conservation planning in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.