Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42132129›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2026

The Ethical Tightrope of Physical and Environmental Restraint in ICU: A Balancing Act.

Leona Bannon, Aisling Meehan, Natalie McEvoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leona BannonSchool of Nursing Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-4211
Aisling MeehanSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0831-9692
Natalie McEvoyRoyal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7533-166X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical and environmental restraints are synonymous with intensive care unit (ICU) practices in many countries around the world. The ICU environment is highly complex, and it is essential to maintain patient safety, but this can often be to the detriment of patients' autonomy. This article examines the ethical challenges that arise from the use of physical and environmental restraints in the intensive care unit (ICU). The article provides insights from both the patient and clinician perspectives using a real-life-informed fictional case and aims to shed light on the intricate ethical landscape surrounding these practices. It highlights the need to carefully balance patient autonomy, safety and clinical priorities when navigating these complex ethical dilemmas.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsRestraint, PhysicalEthical DilemmasHumansPatient SafetyPersonal Autonomy

Identifiers

PMID42132129
PMCPMC13173626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.