Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42132118›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Effort produces after-effects costly for others but valued for self.

Ya Zheng, Rumeng Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ya Zheng *Department of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7469-5955
Rumeng Tang *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health and Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5243-5772

Funding

2024 Tertiary Education Scientific Research Project of Guangzhou Municipal Education Bureau 2024312195National Natural Science Foundation of China 31971027National Natural Science Foundation of China 32571255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engaging in prosocial behavior requires effort, yet people are often averse to exerting effort for others' benefit. However, it remains unclear how effort exertion affects subsequent reward evaluation during prosocial acts. Here, we combined high-temporal-resolution electroencephalography with a paradigm that independently manipulated physical effort and monetary reward for self and others to elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying the reward after-effect of prosocial effort expenditure. We found dissociable reward after-effects for self-benefiting and other-benefiting effort. For self-benefiting rewards, the reward positivity (RewP) increased with effort demand, suggesting an effort-enhancement effect. In contrast, for other-benefiting rewards, the RewP decreased as effort increased, demonstrating an effort-discounting effect. Critically, this dissociation was contingent upon high reward magnitude and modulated by individual differences in effort discounting, yet remained distinct from performance evaluation. Our findings reveal distinct neural computations for self- and other-benefiting efforts, offering new insights into how prior effort expenditure shapes reward evaluation during prosocial behavior.

Indexed as

RewardSocial BehaviorElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleafter-effectefforthumanneuroscienceprosocial behaviorrewardreward positivity

Identifiers

PMID42132118
PMCPMC13175574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.