Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42132088›Full record

ArticleHelicobacter

Incorporating Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Novel Model for Predicting Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia.

Xujin Chen, Dehua Tang, Ningjing Gao, Muhan Ni, Peng Yan, Zhanwen Ji, Xiang Xin, Cheng Yang, Lei Wang, Qiang Zhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Helicobacter. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xujin ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9667-7731
Dehua TangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Provincial Gastrointestinal Medical Innovation Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Ningjing GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Provincial Gastrointestinal Medical Innovation Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Muhan NiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Provincial Gastrointestinal Medical Innovation Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Peng YanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Provincial Gastrointestinal Medical Innovation Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Zhanwen JiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Provincial Gastrointestinal Medical Innovation Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xiang XinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Provincial Gastrointestinal Medical Innovation Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Cheng YangDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Provincial Gastrointestinal Medical Innovation Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0178-5930
Qiang ZhanDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsEarly detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) is critical for reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Existing prediction models exhibit limited discriminative power. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a novel risk prediction model for ACN, with particular emphasis on incorporating gastric-related indicators to enable integrated gastrointestinal tumor screening.

methodsConsecutive patients who underwent concurrent gastroscopy and colonoscopy for screening, symptomatic assessment, or surveillance purposes were recruited from the endoscopy center between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023. Comprehensive data including demographic characteristics, family history, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection status, and gastric histopathological results were collected. Patients with incomplete data were excluded a priori with no imputation. Candidate variables were selected using Elastic Net and LASSO regression to develop the prediction model. The model was trained on 80% of the data (n = 2045) and internally validated on the remaining 20% (n = 495).

resultsAmong 2540 participants [mean age 59.0 years; 1269 males (50.0%)], the overall prevalence of ACN was 13.1% (333/2540). The final Elastic Net model incorporated eight variables, with H. pylori infection as the strongest predictor. In the internal validation cohort, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.837 (95% CI: 0.781-0.892), with 75.8% sensitivity, 82.2% specificity, and 81.4% accuracy. Calibration metrics showed good agreement between predicted and observed ACN risks (Brier score = 0.103; calibration plots showed non-significant deviation from perfect calibration). It significantly outperformed the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score (AUC = 0.622), its revised edition (AUC = 0.589), and the Colorectal Tumor Prediction Score (AUC = 0.570) (all p < 0.001, DeLong's test). Using the model's optimal cutoff, 25.1% (124/495) of the internal validation cohort were stratified as high-risk, with an ACN detection rate of 37.9%. The number of participants needed to screen (PNS) to detect one ACN case was only 3 in the high-risk group, compared with 25 in the low-risk group, thus demonstrating markedly improved screening efficiency.

conclusionsThis study develops and internally validates a risk prediction model for ACN that integrates gastric-related indicators, with H. pylori infection as the key predictor. The model exhibits promising retrospective risk stratification performance in patients undergoing concurrent gastroscopy and colonoscopy for screening, symptomatic assessment, or surveillance. It enables retrospective risk assessment during routine endoscopy, but its clinical utility for guiding prospective colonoscopy referral decisions requires further validation in prospective cohorts.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriAgedColonoscopyDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsadvanced colorectal neoplasiacombined gastrointestinal tumor screeninggastric‐related indicatorsHelicobacter pylori infectionrisk prediction model

Identifiers

PMID42132088
PMCPMC13173598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.