ArticlePest management science2026
Walking inhibition effect of different surfaces in apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata.
Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe apple snail Pomacea canaliculata causes significant damage to the agricultural industry, primarily in Asia, by feeding on rice leaves and other crops. Although it has been designated as a priority invasive species in Japan and various measures to control it have been implemented, its range expanded to 35 prefectures by 2022. Though chemical control methods like pesticides and collection of adult snails are common, the efficiency is low due to the large number of eggs laid. This study investigated surface structures that inhibit the vertical movement of apple snails, as a new non-chemical control method, reducing their ability to climb emergent structures where oviposition occurs.
resultsLaboratory experiments involving walking on differently shaped surfaces revealed several effective designs, such as slits and thorns, for the prevention of snail movement. Surfaces featuring horizontal (5 mm high × 15 mm interval) and vertical (5 mm high × 5 mm interval) slits strongly reduced upward passage to approximately 0.4 and 5.1%, respectively, compared with that on the control surface at 19.7% (risk differences: -19.2 and -14.5 percentage points).
conclusionThis study presented the structures to be designed and the verification methods possible in the laboratory. Surface structures that inhibit walking can be applied as a new control method for capture traps and concrete waterways. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.