ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
Online anatomical images are an effective resource to improve knowledge acquisition and practical exam performance in gross anatomy.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anatomical knowledge is fundamental to the training of students enrolled in health sciences degree programs. Although the use of images is common in anatomy teaching, it remains unclear whether progressive autonomous exposure to cadaveric images improves student performance in assessments based on cadaveric material. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of high-quality cadaveric images for teaching visceral anatomy to first-year medical students at the University of Valencia, focusing on their impact on cadaver-based practical performance. High-quality images of dissections from the head, neck, and thoracic regions were obtained and made available to students for self-directed study and self-assessment in preparation for the practical examination in the dissection room. A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in which two theoretical groups of students had access to the images (n = 180), while two additional groups served as controls (n = 182). A second analysis was also performed within the intervention groups using online quizzes to evaluate knowledge acquisition, together with a survey assessing student satisfaction with the learning materials. Results showed a significant improvement in online quizzes and practical exam questions with images' aid, indicating enhanced knowledge acquisition. Furthermore, students with access to the images achieved significantly higher scores in the practical examination than those in the control groups. These findings suggest that structured digital resources that support independent learning can improve knowledge acquisition and performance in cadaver-based assessments. Such resources may be particularly valuable in contexts where access to cadaveric material or teaching time is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.