Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131997›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2026

Developing physical seed priming as a practical tool for stress-resilient crop production.

Eduardo A Zelada Lau, Michael R Roberts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eduardo A Zelada LauLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-0054-1590
Michael R RobertsLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-1441-7363

Funding

UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (AFRC) BB/X010902/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seed priming is a common approach to improve germination and seedling stress tolerance. Most priming treatments involve imbibition of seeds in water or in solutions of different chemicals, followed by redrying seed before the completion of germination. Physical priming treatments based on various forms of radiation or non-thermal plasma, for example, are also possible. Physical priming has some advantages over imbibition-based priming treatments, including avoiding negative impacts on the longevity of primed seed. Physical priming has potential for applications in agriculture, but questions remain about mechanisms of action and the range of outcomes generated by different types of treatment. Here, we suggest potential mechanisms by which physical treatments might impact the future performance of seeds and seedlings, including physiochemical modifications of the seed coat, generation of reactive oxygen species, and DNA-damage responses. In particular, we discuss how biological responses may be triggered by treatment of dry seeds that lack significant metabolic activity. We also briefly consider downstream molecular and biochemical responses to physical priming in germinating seeds. We conclude our review by briefly reflecting on key steps required for effective commercial exploitation.

Indexed as

Crop ProductionCrops, AgriculturalSeedsStress, PhysiologicalGerminationReactive Oxygen SpeciesSeedlingsReactive Oxygen SpeciesAbiotic stressGerminationPhysical stimulusSeed priming

Identifiers

PMID42131997
PMCPMC13425016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.