ArticleBiology open2026
Kinetic properties of optogenetic site-specific DNA recombination by LiCre-loxP.
Article in Biology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in optogenetics now allow specific modifications to the DNA of live cells with light. However, successfully using these technologies requires knowing their properties in terms of sensitivity, efficiency, kinetics and mechanism. We previously developed an optogenetic tool made of a single chimeric protein called LiCre that enables the induction of specific changes in the genome with blue light via DNA recombination between loxP sites ( Duplus-Bottin et al., 2021). Here, we used in vitro and in vivo experiments combined with kinetic modeling to provide a deeper characterization of the photoactivated LiCre-loxP recombination reaction. We find that LiCre binds DNA with high affinity in the absence of a light stimulus and that this binding is cooperative, although not as much as for the Cre recombinase from which LiCre was derived. In yeast, the addition of riboflavin to the culture medium had no effect on LiCre's efficiency, even when cells over-expressed riboflavin kinase, suggesting that the abundance of the flavin mononucleotide cofactor is not limiting for the reaction. However, LiCre's efficiency in yeast gradually increased when raising the temperature from 20°C to 37°C. The recombination kinetics observed in live cells are best explained by a model where the photoactivation of two or more DNA-bound LiCre units (happening in seconds) can produce (in several minutes) a functional recombination synapse. This model was able to capture the effect of a point mutation altering LiCre's light cycle. This deeper understanding of the LiCre-loxP system provides additional knowledge for designing experiments where specific genetic changes are induced in live cells with light.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.