Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131888›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2026

Erratum: Relationship between khat chewing and upper digestive tract cancers among male patients in Hargeisa: a preliminary case-control study.

Abdiwahab M Ali, Mirriam N Mutuku, Abdiwahab Hashi, Omar M Muhumed

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdiwahab M AliDepartment of Public Health, School of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Amoud University, Sha'abka, Hargeisa 63252, Somaliland.
Mirriam N MutukuDepartment of Public Health, School of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Amoud University, Sha'abka, Hargeisa 63252, Somaliland.
Abdiwahab HashiSchool of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Amoud University, Sha'abka, Hargeisa 63252, Somaliland.
Omar M MuhumedSchool of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Amoud University, Sha'abka, Hargeisa 63252, Somaliland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Khat chewing is a common cultural practice in countries bordering the Red Sea and the east coast of Africa. Despite some indications in the literature, its association with upper digestive tract (UDT) cancers is under-researched. Methods: This case-control study investigated the relationship between khat chewing and UDT cancers among male patients in Hargeisa, Somaliland. A total of 97 participants (36 cases with UDT cancer and 61 controls) were recruited using purposive sampling from the two cancer clinics in Somaliland: Nageeye Cancer Clinic and Needle Hospital. Data were collected via structured interviewer-administered questionnaires. Analysis was performed using Stata/MP version 16. Results: After adjusting for confounders, khat chewing was significantly associated with increased UDT cancer risk in a dose-response manner. Ever chewing khat was associated with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 3.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-11.2; p = 0.024). Chewing for >20 years had an aOR of 36.8 (95% CI 7.16-303; p < 0.001), daily chewing an aOR of 22.6 (95% CI 5.30-124; p < 0.001) and consuming >600 g per session an aOR of 6.87 (95% CI 2.06-25.8; p = 0.002). Conclusion: These findings highlight a strong association between khat chewing and UDT cancers and underscore the urgent need for public health interventions, including awareness campaigns and policy measures, to mitigate khat-related cancer risks in Somaliland.

Indexed as

khat chewingrisk factorsSomalilandUDT cancers

Identifiers

PMID42131888
PMCPMC13161583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.