ArticleRevista Cuidarte
Validation of an educational material to promote spiritual well-being in oncology patients.
Article in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer is a disease that impacts not only physical and emotional levels, but also the spiritual level. Therefore, spiritual well-being is essential for quality of life. In this context, educational materials designed to foster spiritual well-being play a crucial role. Objective: To validate educational material aimed at promoting spiritual well-being in oncology patients. Materials and Methods: A quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional study was conducted with exploration and validation phases of an educational material. The study population consisted of oncology patients and experts. Results: The target population showed a high level of spiritual well-being (26/30). The material was developed through an iterative review process. The validation and evaluation revealed that 7 out of 10 experts rated the educational material as superior, while 9 out of 10 members of the target population rated it as superior, particularly in the areas of "content,""illustrations," and "cultural appropriateness," with a significant difference in "cultural appropriateness" (τ=0.73; p=0.03), where the target population perceived it more positively. Discussion: The material obtained high scores, and understanding spiritual well-being allowed the identification of improvements and adaptation of the material to the target audience. There is a lack of studies regarding the validation of educational materials on spiritual well-being in oncology. This study contributes to and encourages future culturally relevant research. Conclusion: The material was well accepted and developed according to the needs and literature, and it represents progress in promoting oncological care by providing an accessible and culturally appropriate tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.