ArticleMedical acupuncture2026
Effects of Checkpoint Acupuncture on Postoperative Pain Following Intestinal Surgery: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Medical acupuncture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acupuncture (AC) has shown promising effects in alleviating pain, with minimal side effects, but high-quality feasibility data are lacking in surgical context. The primary aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate whether AC could be successfully implemented in patients after intestinal surgery, with secondary, exploratory assessment of pain-related outcomes. Methods: Patients who had undergone intestinal surgery were assessed for eligibility if they exhibited abdominal pain with a visual analog scale (VAS) score of ≥3 during their postoperative visit. Based on the patients' most hypersensitive abdominal region, the so-called gastrointestinal checkpoint (G1-G6), AC was performed once using semipermanent needles. Evaluations were performed prior to the intervention and subsequently at 5 min, 1 h, and 24 h postintervention. The evaluation encompassed subjective pain levels using VAS, abdominal pain pressure threshold (PPT), and variations in abdominal skin temperature. Results: Of 58 patients screened, 42 (72%) were enrolled in this feasibility study and 36 (86%) provided complete data for analysis. All 36 participants received the AC intervention per protocol, and no serious adverse events were observed. Exploratory outcomes demonstrated a 74% median reduction in VAS pain at 5 min post-AC ( Conclusions: Implementation of AC in the immediate postoperative setting proved feasible and safe. AC may have potential analgesic effects after intestinal surgery, which should be examined in further randomized and blinded trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.