Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42131829›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology

Pharmacotherapy for sleep during critical illness and beyond.

Gerald L Weinhouse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gerald L WeinhouseBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep is a complex process thought to be regulated by both a circadian system closely tied to ambient light and a homeostatic process characterized by increasing pressure to sleep commensurate with increasing duration of wakefulness. Critical illness is often a complex, multi-system physiological insult characterized by high levels of stress hormones and inflammatory biomarkers as well as pain and anxiety which negatively impacts sleep. Sleep loss may potentiate physiological disturbances and is increasingly being linked to poor ICU outcomes. The current gold standard for improving the sleep of ICU patients is to bundle multiple non-pharmacologic interventions; medication should only be prescribed for sleep when those measures failed to produce the desired results. Medication administered to facilitate sleep has had disappointing results in the ICU and may have unintended consequences such as increasing the risk of delirium and falls. In general, pharmacotherapies used to induce sleep (hypnotics) have focused on targeting specific points along the arousal/sleep pathway. Another approach has been to enhance chronotropy both by non-pharmacologic measures as well as by melatonin supplementation or administration of melatonin receptor agonists. There have been some efforts to promote wakefulness as an effort to leverage the homeostatic pressure to sleep at night rather than allowing sleep to occur intermittently throughout the 24 h day as occurs during critical illness. This review will summarize the current data regarding the pharmacologic management of sleep in the ICU and propose one potential approach.

Indexed as

chronotherapycircadiancritical illnessdeliriumhomeostatic controlhypnoticpharmacotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42131829
PMCPMC13160756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.