ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Comparative Evaluation of Shade Selection Reliability: Visual Assessment, Intraoral Scanning, and Photographic Techniques.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Shade Selection Reliability: Visual Assessment, Intraoral Scanning, and Photographic Techniques.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The critical role of color matching in prosthetic dentistry underscores the necessity of identifying the most dependable shade selection technique, thereby reducing the incidence of dissatisfaction in esthetic dental outcomes. This research evaluated the reliability of the field's three predominant shade selection techniques (visual assessment, intraoral scanning, and photography). Materials and Methods: A group of 26 individuals with nearly pristine maxillary right central incisors (free from wear, discoloration, or enamel defects) aged between 20 and 40 years was selected for this study. The color matching of these teeth was conducted using three methods: visual assessment by three specialized evaluators, intraoral scanning, and photographic documentation (utilizing both a single-lens reflex (SLR) camera and a smartphone). These procedures were repeated after a fortnight, and the reliability of each method was assessed and compared through the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test (with a significance threshold set at 0.05). Results: The outcomes revealed a notable disparity in the reliability of different shade selection approaches ( Conclusions: The findings suggest that intraoral scanning is the most reliable method for accurate color determination of teeth, outperforming visual assessments. The use of photographic images, regardless of the capture device, proved to be the least reliable method. Clinical Significance: Achieving an exact color match is crucial for the success of any restorative dental procedure. The most reliable method for this precision is through an intraoral scanner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.