ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Narciclasine has demonstrated anticancer activity at low nanomolar concentrations in various preclinical cancer models, but no clinical data in cancer patients are available. Although its biological activity and structure-activity relationships are relatively well characterized, the pharmacological properties of narciclasine have not been reported. This information will benefit the research to further develop narciclasine. The goal of the current study is to characterize the physicochemical properties, metabolic stability, and P-glycoprotein substrate status of narciclasine. Methods: We first developed a robust HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry assay to measure narciclasine in mouse plasma. Then, we assessed the stability, metabolic pathways, and cytochrome P450 inhibitory effect of narciclasine. We also evaluated narciclasine for its P-glycoprotein substrate status using two methods: 1) Caco-2 permeability assay, and 2) cytotoxicity assay in human cancer cells with exogenous expression of P-glycoprotein. Results: Narciclasine was stable in the plasma of the four species tested. It showed metabolic stability in human liver microsomes and hepatocytes, but in other species, metabolic clearance was higher than in humans, indicating that humans may metabolize narciclasine minimally. Further studies to identify the metabolic pathway of narciclasine detected trace amounts of reduction and glucuronidation in human liver microsomes. Narciclasine was highly soluble under both thermodynamic and kinetic conditions over a range of pH values, with a lipophilicity value of 0.40, indicating it is hydrophilic. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) overexpression reduced the Conclusion: Narciclasine demonstrates metabolic stability in human liver microsomes and hepatocyts, and its cancer cell penetration is minimally affected by P-glycoprotein. These data will inform future development of narciclasine as a cancer therapeutic agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.