ReviewOrthopedic research and reviews2026
Medial Meniscal Extrusion: A Narrative Review of Etiology, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Strategies.
Review in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Meniscal extrusion: Multiple theories, one clinical challenge.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To comprehensively review recent developments in the etiology, imaging diagnosis, and treatment strategies for medial meniscal extrusion, highlighting biomechanical considerations and individualized therapeutic approaches. Methods: We performed a narrative review of English-language clinical, imaging, and biomechanical studies by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from database inception to June 30, 2024, using terms related to meniscal extrusion, meniscal root tears, meniscotibial ligament injury, osteoarthritis, and corrective osteotomy, and we also screened reference lists of relevant reviews. Studies were included if they explicitly evaluated medial meniscal extrusion and reported quantitative extrusion assessment and/or its determinants, diagnostic performance, or treatment-related changes; we excluded studies not focused on medial extrusion, non-original articles without analyzable data, and reports lacking quantifiable extrusion outcomes. Results: Eighty-five studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Current evidence indicates that medial meniscal extrusion most commonly arises from posterior root tears and degenerative tears that disrupt hoop tension, and is further amplified by meniscotibial ligament insufficiency, varus malalignment, increased body mass index, osteophytes, and subchondral insufficiency fracture, forming a self-reinforcing pathway of extrusion, compartment overload, cartilage loss, and subchondral bone changes. MRI remains the reference standard for static assessment, whereas ultrasound and weight-bearing protocols better capture load-dependent displacement; however, measurement planes, anatomical landmarks, and thresholds vary, limiting cross-study comparability. Across treatment studies, reported strategies ranged from structured nonoperative care to root repair, meniscal centralization, and high tibial osteotomy. In appropriately selected knees, studies evaluating combined biomechanical correction and meniscal stabilization more consistently reported measurable reductions in extrusion than isolated procedures, although outcome definitions and follow-up durations were heterogeneous. Conclusion: Medial meniscal extrusion is best understood as a mechano-structural failure state rather than an isolated imaging sign. Standardized measurement strategies and prospective comparative studies are needed to define actionable thresholds and refine patient-specific treatment pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.